PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.79%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.87%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
20.72%
Positive EBIT growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.68%
Positive operating income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.76%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.49%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.32%
Slight or no buyback while QRVO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
13.33%
Dividend growth of 13.33% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
47.26%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
47.49%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
47.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 62.16%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
40.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 61.35%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
16.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 35.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
120.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 1083.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 101.26%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
18.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
128.52%
Below 50% of QRVO's 282.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
122.19%
Below 50% of QRVO's 910.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
425.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
12.26%
Below 50% of QRVO's 288.02%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1.64%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.74%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
681.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 681.02% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.12%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
64.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.37% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.58%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-5.65%
Inventory is declining while QRVO stands at 7.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.63%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.11%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
4.74%
We have some new debt while QRVO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QRVO's 3.40%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-2.21%
We cut SG&A while QRVO invests at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.