PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 34.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.01%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 50.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
15.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 92.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.13%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 139.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 41.27%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 41.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.63%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 42.17%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.21%
Slight or no buyback while QRVO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.10%
Dividend growth under 50% of QRVO's 194.02%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
14.65%
OCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 31.12%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.52%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 28.72%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 203.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 84.93%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 43.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 8720.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
115.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to QRVO's 105.64%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
22.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 42.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
259.89%
Below 50% of QRVO's 599.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
156.30%
Below 50% of QRVO's 3702.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.48%
Below 50% of QRVO's 324.70%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
28.12%
Below 50% of QRVO's 716.33%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
21.70%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
11.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 0.12%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
686.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 686.53% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
168.06%
Below 50% of QRVO's 789.51%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.54% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.44%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QRVO's 47.89%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.91%
Asset growth well under 50% of QRVO's 13.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
9.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. QRVO's 42.79%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.30%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QRVO's 20.20%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.