205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.38%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 3.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 9.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.49%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 7.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 34.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 46.83%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.96%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 47.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 47.46%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.47%
OCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 43.67%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
11.93%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 54.82%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
66.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 28.53%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
37.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 113.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
14.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 44.51%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
164.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 197.01%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
86.38%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 123.99%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
21.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 66.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
301.53%
Below 50% of QRVO's 4535.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
118.16%
Below 50% of QRVO's 2285.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.19%
Below 50% of QRVO's 778.35%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
36.59%
Below 50% of QRVO's 121.64%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
28.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 4.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
688.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 688.88% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.47%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
64.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.28% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.90%
AR growth well above QRVO's 4.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.38%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 0.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.96%
Positive asset growth while QRVO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.95%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.92%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
23.80%
We have some new debt while QRVO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.77%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.