PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.07%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.28%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 25.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.59%
Positive operating income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.81%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 48.60%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.48%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 49.72%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.66%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 49.43%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.62%
Dividend growth of 12.62% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-44.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
73.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 124.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
52.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 99.66%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
34.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 80.94%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
198.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 2165.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
83.17%
Below 50% of QRVO's 185.55%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.33%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 74.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
782.06%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 1200.98%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
120.11%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1496.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
77.97%
Below 50% of QRVO's 2781.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
49.67%
Below 50% of QRVO's 326.15%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
37.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 4.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 8.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
576.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 576.51% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.41%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
48.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.82% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.90%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.52%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 5.93%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.03%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.56%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.61%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 3.47%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.03%
We have some new debt while QRVO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.26%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QRVO's 7.75%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.