PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 3.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.75%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of QRVO's 3.35%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
2.63%
EBIT growth 50-75% of QRVO's 3.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
2.40%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
2.95%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.03%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.11%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.04%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
58.23%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 137.47%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 80.97%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 79.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 2855.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
191.60%
Below 50% of QRVO's 554.80%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 408.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
928.53%
Below 50% of QRVO's 11365.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
138.70%
Below 50% of QRVO's 5830.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
83.99%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1167.68%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.79%
Below 50% of QRVO's 349.15%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 11.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.88% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.37% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.53%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QRVO's 12.92%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.85%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 12.28%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.43%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.70%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.51%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QRVO's 3.25%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.46%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QRVO's 15.59%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.