PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 13.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.32%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 13.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 16.96%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.24%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 21.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
4.09%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 11.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.20%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 12.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 13.15%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-17.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 269.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 66.03%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 59.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
224.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 7799.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
108.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 12.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
0.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 28.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
536.51%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1297.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
134.40%
Below 50% of QRVO's 2981.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.80%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1020.39%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.50%
Below 50% of QRVO's 799.98%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 8.66%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
69.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 14.94%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
573.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 573.58% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.97% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.53%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while QRVO cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
22.01%
AR growth well above QRVO's 34.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.75%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 4.81%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while QRVO invests at 4.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.86%
Under 50% of QRVO's 2.62%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.88%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QRVO's 4.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.