PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 11.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 43.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.82%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 172.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.96%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 1516.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 173.82%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.53%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 176.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 180.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.60%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-126.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 271.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
21.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 75.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 63.57%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
152.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 9286.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-17.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is at 51.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-17.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO stands at 75.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
216.94%
Below 50% of QRVO's 870.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
31.88%
Below 50% of QRVO's 554.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
25.88%
Below 50% of QRVO's 158.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
74.95%
Below 50% of QRVO's 795.11%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
61.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 9.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
110.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 15.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
342.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 342.27% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.75% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.90% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.21%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QRVO's 20.28%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
13.41%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.88%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.60%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
10.79%
Debt growth far above QRVO's 0.01%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.84%
We increase R&D while QRVO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.