PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-3.26%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-0.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.07%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Dividend growth of 0.09% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.46%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1040.43%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
68.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
13.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 10.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
19.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with QRVO's 96.02%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-1.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is at 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
35.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
227.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
16.17%
Below 50% of QRVO's 39.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
81.65%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 130.04%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
68.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 8.23%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
101.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 10.04%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.61%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.61% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.84% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.02%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.80%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 1.95%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.26%
Positive asset growth while QRVO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.34%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt growth far above QRVO's 0.02%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-1.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.