PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 69.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 113.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.20%
Negative EBIT growth while QRVO is at 555.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.95%
Negative operating income growth while QRVO is at 414.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.99%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 323.64%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.65%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 327.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 325.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above QRVO's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
54.47%
OCF growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 107.20%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
319.48%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 1088.23%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
36.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 168.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 60.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QRVO stands at 21.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
138.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 226.61%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-10.13%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-25.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
93.78%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1149.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-11.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while QRVO is 289.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-40.93%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
93.15%
Below 50% of QRVO's 342.98%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
108.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.68%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
56.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 1.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
330.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.83% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.63%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
27.31%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while QRVO cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
2.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QRVO's 89.65%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.56%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.47%
Similar asset growth to QRVO's 0.48%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.14%
Similar to QRVO's 1.16%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-2.10%
We’re deleveraging while QRVO stands at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QRVO's 7.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.20%
We expand SG&A while QRVO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.