PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.27%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.54%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.51%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-134.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 335.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 41.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-15.86%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
60.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 247.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
2.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-59.84%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
106.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-45.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
81.59%
Below 50% of QRVO's 643.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
117.02%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
18.72%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
299.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.12% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
50.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 50.60% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.13% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
77.72%
AR growth well above QRVO's 2.94%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.53%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 2.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.73%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QRVO's 4.29%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QRVO's 23.43%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.