PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.33%
Revenue growth of 0.33% vs. zero growth in Semiconductors. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-1.92%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -0.13%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-542.50%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is -0.19%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-231.58%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is -0.19%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-293.42%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -4.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-274.42%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -0.24%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-274.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -0.24%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-2.51%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.32%
Dividend growth of 2.32% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-7.27%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-52.53%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
53.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 81.42%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
11.08%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
3.47%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Semiconductors median of 25.64%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12095.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 12095.78% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-44.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-937.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Semiconductors median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1.99%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-193.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
66.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
108.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.73% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-69.20%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
33.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.29% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
10.02%
AR growth of 10.02% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-13.16%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.42%
Asset growth near Semiconductors median. Charlie Munger attributes it to a typical industry cycle of capital investment.
-3.93%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 1.68%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
44.26%
Debt growth of 44.26% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
90.64%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
-2.24%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.