PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.15%
Revenue growth near Semiconductors median of 11.74%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
8.67%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 14.74%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
-18.95%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is 24.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-14.93%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is 24.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-47.61%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 26.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-48.68%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 27.43%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-47.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 26.92%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.47%
Share growth above Semiconductors median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.45%
Dividend growth of 2.45% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-23.75%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-222.99%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
42.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Semiconductors median of 138.77%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-19.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 74.41%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
13.52%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Semiconductors median of 38.07%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
2418.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 2418.16% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-16.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-19.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
7472.52%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 161.56% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Semiconductors median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
-64.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 79.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
287.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 287.85% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
182.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 182.94% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
76.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 39.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
15.66%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.66% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-4.26%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-1.77%
Dividend reductions while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
12.58%
Receivables growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
10.11%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-6.23%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.27%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 6.75%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.89%
Debt growth of 4.89% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
33.25%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
13.25%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.