PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.23%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -11.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-17.32%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -13.24%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
17.79%
EBIT growth of 17.79% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
17.79%
Operating income growth of 17.79% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
40.61%
Positive net income growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-6.67%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.67%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.15%
Dividend growth of 7.15% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-43.00%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -1.42%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-90.98%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-22.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 44.08%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-30.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 28.98%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 17.38%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
23879.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 23879.66% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
98.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 98.23% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-44.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
26.28%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Semiconductors is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
27.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-166.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -88.42%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
283.66%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 41.60% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
154.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 75.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
78.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
-68.64%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
1.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.81% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
1.65%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.65% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-13.03%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-16.82%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.73%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.32%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.53%
Debt growth of 1.53% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-13.11%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-22.00%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.