PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
17.45%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
99.20%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
99.20%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
269.42%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 18.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
271.43%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
257.14%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.54%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.20%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
3.44%
Diluted share growth above 2x Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
0.54%
Dividend growth of 0.54% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
34.92%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
28.24%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 67.02%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
8.86%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-19.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -19.83%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
64.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.67% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-17.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
4.61%
3Y OCF/share growth of 4.61% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
151.10%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Semiconductors is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
147.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-34.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -98.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
308.57%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 21.21% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
72.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 26.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-8.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
31.93%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.93% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-1.18%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
5.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
5.69%
Receivables growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-0.50%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.09%
Asset growth of 3.09% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.01%
Positive BV/share change while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-4.68%
Debt is shrinking while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.38%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
-4.57%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.