205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 1.94%. John Neff would look for catalysts to surpass sector growth.
1.31%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 2.44%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is 0.49%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.49%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-70.59%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 1.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-69.48%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-69.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 1.56%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-3.03%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.30%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.93%
Dividend growth of 0.93% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -1.15%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
57.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 73.11%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 51.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
69.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 30.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
176.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 176.00% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
39.23%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 25.40%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 54.96% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 140.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
79.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Semiconductors median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
194.56%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 31.89% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
15.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 15.59% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
20.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
37.98%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.29%
AR growth of 8.29% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.69%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-7.18%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.02%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 1.56%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
3.35%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.