PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.26%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -9.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-26.53%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -6.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
22.34%
EBIT growth of 22.34% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-80.00%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.47%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.62%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.47%
Dividend growth of 0.47% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-77.55%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -10.61%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-80.02%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -1.29%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
28.28%
10Y CAGR of 28.28% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-3.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-22.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
45.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 45.03% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-13.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-43.98%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-91.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Semiconductors median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-93.70%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-96.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -5.49%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
72.90%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.90% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
3.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 3.59% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
1.88%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 1.88% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
435.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 435.74% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
417.97%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 417.97% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
265.17%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 265.17% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
23.22%
AR growth of 23.22% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-20.15%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.38%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.78%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.44%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-15.75%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.