PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 12.47%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
12.14%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 17.92%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
15.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of Semiconductors median of 37.08%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental operating challenges.
16.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of Semiconductors median of 43.56%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
16.87%
Net income growth below 50% of Semiconductors median of 36.26%. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper profitability issues.
18.87%
EPS growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 36.01%. Guy Spier might worry about subpar cost control or limited growth levers.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of Semiconductors median of 36.49%. Guy Spier might be concerned about partial underperformance or higher dilution.
-2.03%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.01%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is 16.68%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-43.18%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is 11.97%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
74.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 15.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 6.92%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
24.50%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.50% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Semiconductors median of 12.37%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
65.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
49.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
9.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.16% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
15.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 15.04% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
0.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 0.96% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
384.68%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.39%
AR growth of 12.39% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.72%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-1.67%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.55%
Near Semiconductors median. Charlie Munger considers it standard net worth compounding for the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
5.29%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.