PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Positive revenue growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-0.51%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -6.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is -12.86%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.06%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is -13.98%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -15.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-8.77%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -9.88%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -9.52%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.04%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.95%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.30%
Dividend cuts while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
80.35%
OCF growth of 80.35% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
166.20%
FCF growth of 166.20% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
173.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 48.64%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
21.32%
5Y revenue/share growth near Semiconductors median of 19.49%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
16.64%
3Y revenue/share growth near Semiconductors median of 16.64%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
397.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 397.80% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
257.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 257.54% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
850.50%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 113.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
12.70%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
21.68%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
39.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 39.50% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
20.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 20.69% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
323.55%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 323.55% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.70%
AR growth of 6.70% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.52%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
22.28%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.19%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
65.84%
Debt growth of 65.84% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-6.84%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.60%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.