PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 2.26%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
13.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
37.52%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 8.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
-6.84%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is 5.52%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 7.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-5.08%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 6.80%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 6.07%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.63%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.05%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.31%
Dividend growth of 0.31% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
70.77%
OCF growth of 70.77% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.99%
FCF growth of 77.99% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
100.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 25.86%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.95%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-6.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -1.66%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
254.02%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 36.71% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
30.17%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-5.66%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is -0.86%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
120.73%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
32.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Semiconductors median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
-20.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -13.06%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
51.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 51.69% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
30.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
19.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 13.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
1205.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1205.79% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
179.73%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 179.73% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
132.68%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.68% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.21%
AR growth of 2.21% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.35%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-0.79%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.48%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
-0.08%
Debt is shrinking while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-5.40%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.27%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.