PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.20%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -6.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-13.82%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -8.67%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-14.40%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is -11.26%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-16.11%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is -14.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-19.40%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -12.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-19.33%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -11.11%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -11.11%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.22%
Share growth above Semiconductors median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.22%
Diluted share growth above 2x Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-0.05%
Dividend cuts while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -16.15%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-129.77%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -9.67%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
45.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Semiconductors median of 48.64%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
5.11%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-13.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 12.36%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
161.49%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 17.61% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-5.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-44.30%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
169.54%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 94.59% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 78.69%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-36.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -4.34%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
89.97%
Equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median. John Neff would urge improved returns on retained earnings to catch up.
105.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 50.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
69.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 33.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
332.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.40% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
68.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
27.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.51% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-6.49%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.10%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
7.84%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
0.29%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
20.36%
Slightly rising debt while Semiconductors median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
3.91%
We slightly increase R&D while Semiconductors is cutting. Peter Lynch sees a chance to grab market share with new offerings if ROI is managed well.
3.88%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.