PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.12%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
14.74%
Positive EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
18.05%
Positive operating income growth while Semiconductors is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
9.84%
Positive net income growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
10.85%
Positive EPS growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
10.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.22%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.44%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.02%
Dividend cuts while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
119.08%
Positive OCF growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
302.55%
Positive FCF growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
56.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 71.74%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
38.54%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 49.68%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
-13.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.11%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
158.33%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 59.56% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
9.09%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos would question the firm’s ability to convert sales into real cash in the mid-term.
6.59%
Positive short-term OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a strong competitive advantage in near-term cash generation.
111.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 31.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-5.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -2.71%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-42.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -22.62%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
83.06%
Equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median. John Neff would urge improved returns on retained earnings to catch up.
116.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 45.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
17.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
297.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 297.32% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
51.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 51.38% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
18.05%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.05% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-36.69%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.67%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
3.48%
We expand assets while Semiconductors is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
0.20%
Positive BV/share change while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
9.30%
Slightly rising debt while Semiconductors median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
1.93%
R&D growth far exceeding Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
2.75%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.