205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.27%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.27%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-368.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -329.83%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-368.46%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -329.83%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
1.71%
Net income growth of 1.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 39.31%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
31.19%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 39.31%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
31.19%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 40.09%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.31%
Net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
317.31%
Net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
317.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would urge improved returns on retained earnings to catch up.
13.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
13.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
-46.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-46.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-46.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.