PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth near Technology median of 3.49%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
12.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
1050.00%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
1050.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.01%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
69.74%
OCF growth of 69.74% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
20.39%
FCF growth of 20.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 52.17%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
18.60%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
10.01%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 45.86%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
76.59%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.33%
AR growth of 6.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.96%
Inventory growth of 3.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.15%
Asset growth of 2.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.58%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.84%
Debt growth of 4.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A growth of 5.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.