PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.29%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
171.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-1233.33%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -9.17%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1233.33%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -9.17%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-700.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-445.24%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-445.24%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.04%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
3256.25%
OCF growth of 3256.25% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
223.77%
FCF growth of 223.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
34.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 60.86%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 60.86%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
10.19%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 30.45%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-169.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.00% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
52.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
31.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
-15.63%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-15.63%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-19.11%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.45%
Asset growth of 1.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-3.32%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.34%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth of 10.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.