205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.93%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 5.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-217.14%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 1.55%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-217.14%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.59%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-190.74%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-160.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-160.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.49%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.49%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
402.45%
Dividend growth of 402.45% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-59.18%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
0.93%
FCF growth of 0.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 57.32%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
30.70%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 57.32%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
8.56%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 31.98%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1331.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1331.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-271.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
857.05%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
786.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 786.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.53%
AR growth of 6.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-4.17%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.07%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.85%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
19.44%
Debt growth of 19.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
SG&A growth of 16.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.