PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 4.34%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
134.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-2.59%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.59%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
35.09%
Net income growth of 35.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
25.00%
EPS growth of 25.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
19.32%
Share change of 19.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
19.32%
Diluted share change of 19.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-12.55%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
14.29%
OCF growth of 14.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
6.22%
FCF growth of 6.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 86.66%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
13.74%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-0.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 20.35%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
3Y OCF/share growth of 10.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
258.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 258.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
99.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 99.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
15.18%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 25.03%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 15.19%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-19.54%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
48.99%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-6.13%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-12.16%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-8.02%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.07%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-18.17%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.05%
Debt growth of 1.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A growth of 0.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.