PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.07%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Technology median of 3.57%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental margin deterioration.
3232.57%
EBIT growth of 3232.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3232.57%
Operating income growth of 3232.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-8.90%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2.50%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-18.38%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
16.37%
Diluted share change of 16.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-9.44%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
36.22%
OCF growth of 36.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
88.24%
FCF growth of 88.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 78.91%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
53.45%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
440.05%
Net income/share CAGR of 440.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
56.48%
Net income/share CAGR of 56.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
370.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 370.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
70.39%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.72% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
50.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
11.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-29.09%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
31.31%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 31.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-15.96%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
3.13%
AR growth of 3.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-7.95%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.04%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
23.65%
BV/share growth of 23.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.95%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.