PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 6.36%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
4.16%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Technology median of 6.44%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
2800.34%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
2800.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
1.08%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.19%. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper profitability issues.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
4.28%
Dividend growth of 4.28% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
8.56%
OCF growth of 8.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
11.00%
FCF growth of 11.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 101.58%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 42.34%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 38.15%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 30.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share growth of 13.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
473.10%
Net income/share CAGR of 473.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
370.76%
Net income/share CAGR of 370.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
303.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 39.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
73.62%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.49% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
9.94%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
43.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 19.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-25.54%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-13.13%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-11.62%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-1.10%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.38%
Inventory growth of 1.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.13%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
5.88%
BV/share growth of 5.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-4.09%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.