PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.14%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 8.81%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
13.66%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
17.15%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.49%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
17.15%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
20.87%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.55%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
20.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.36%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.10%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.82%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
1.33%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-0.82%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
68.24%
OCF growth of 68.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
830.00%
FCF growth of 830.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
110.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Technology median of 102.41%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
77.19%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 44.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
45.91%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 40.68%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 164.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
147.97%
3Y OCF/share growth of 147.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1724.99%
Net income/share CAGR of 1724.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
2101.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
224.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 76.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 25.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
53.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 53.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
47.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 47.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-16.51%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-22.60%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
16.65%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
7.20%
Inventory growth of 7.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
7.28%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
7.82%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
0.24%
Debt growth of 0.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.94%
R&D growth of 0.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
17.41%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.