PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.20%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 7.14%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
-6.44%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 5.65%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-6.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-6.41%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.69%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.57%
Share change of 0.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.54%
Dividend growth of 2.54% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
4.31%
OCF growth of 4.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-94.07%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
137.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 85.52%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
76.91%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 48.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
71.38%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
42.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 42.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
665.18%
Net income/share CAGR of 665.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
548.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 548.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
257.19%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 60.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
128.96%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 42.26% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
49.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
98.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
4.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
23.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 23.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
29.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.96% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-5.71%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.77%
Inventory growth of 6.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.61%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
5.79%
BV/share growth of 5.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-6.21%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
40.00%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.