PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.33%
Revenue growth of 0.33% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-1.92%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-542.50%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-231.58%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-293.42%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-274.42%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-274.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-2.51%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.32%
Dividend growth of 2.32% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-7.27%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-52.53%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
53.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 82.02%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
11.08%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
3.47%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 29.15%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12095.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 12095.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-44.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-937.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1.99%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 23.81%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-193.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 38.68%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 50.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
66.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 66.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
108.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.73% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-69.20%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
33.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
10.02%
AR growth of 10.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-13.16%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.42%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.83%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-3.93%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
44.26%
Debt growth of 44.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
90.64%
R&D growth of 90.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.24%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.