PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.94%
Revenue growth of 91.94% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
122.82%
Gross profit growth of 122.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
188.14%
EBIT growth of 188.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
188.14%
Operating income growth of 188.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
560.71%
Net income growth of 560.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
589.13%
EPS growth of 589.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth of 589.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.32%
Share change of 0.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.74%
Diluted share change of 3.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.32%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-54.39%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-88.70%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
43.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 77.94%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
-15.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 46.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 38.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2204.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 2204.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-32.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
39.09%
Net income/share CAGR of 39.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
104.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
-7.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 48.11%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 40.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
63.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 63.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
101.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-22.01%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
80.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-5.56%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.69%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.04%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.01%
BV/share growth of 3.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.71%
R&D growth of 20.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.55%
SG&A growth of 8.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.