PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.91%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
6.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-72.73%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 2.55%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-72.73%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 3.67%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
372.73%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.03%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
200.00%
EPS growth of 200.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 200.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.48%
Diluted share change of 0.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.25%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
786.67%
OCF growth of 786.67% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
125.30%
FCF growth of 125.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
11.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 75.01%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-14.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 55.61%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-35.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 23.97%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 11.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-24.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-54.44%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-61.41%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 40.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-82.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 5.67%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 131.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
60.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 60.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
87.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 87.55% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
14.29%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 14.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
37.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-5.10%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-9.02%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.16%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.55%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.23%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-6.71%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
25.55%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.