205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
13.22%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
597.37%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
634.21%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
215.38%
Net income growth of 215.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
233.33%
EPS growth of 233.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
233.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 233.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.18%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.22%
Dividend growth of 3.22% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
82.20%
OCF growth of 82.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
146.94%
FCF growth of 146.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
9.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 89.64%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-11.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 59.83%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-40.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 25.89%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
6.52%
3Y OCF/share growth of 6.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
43.07%
Net income/share CAGR of 43.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
1.45%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-45.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.79%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 137.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
51.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 51.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
93.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
33.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
2.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-11.07%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-19.26%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.61%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.34%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.15%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-4.90%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-31.95%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.