PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.42%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-0.96%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.87%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-0.65%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 6.09%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.38%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.87%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
21.82%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.03%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
14.29%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
4.86%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
5.55%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-7.44%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
71.52%
OCF growth of 71.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
221.43%
FCF growth of 221.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 83.26%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-18.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 45.83%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-10.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.14%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 17.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
212.82%
3Y OCF/share growth of 212.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
309.18%
Net income/share CAGR of 309.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
90.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 45.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
346.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
112.72%
Equity/share CAGR of 112.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
143.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 143.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
73.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 73.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
74.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 74.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
31.98%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 31.98% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-9.70%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
16.07%
AR growth of 16.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.29%
Inventory growth of 9.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
19.47%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
12.42%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
16.35%
Debt growth of 16.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-4.11%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
10.71%
SG&A growth of 10.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48