PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Revenue growth of 2.34% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
1.44%
Gross profit growth of 1.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
10.06%
EBIT growth of 10.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
9.27%
Operating income growth of 9.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-7.68%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.85%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-5.29%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-4.04%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
8.69%
Dividend growth of 8.69% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-58.68%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-152.53%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
43.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 84.08%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
-12.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 41.19%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
14.04%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 18.41%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
322.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 322.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
57.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 57.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
29.13%
3Y OCF/share growth of 29.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2488.56%
Net income/share CAGR of 2488.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
66.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.18%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
205.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
261.53%
Equity/share CAGR of 261.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
211.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 211.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
147.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 147.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
16.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 16.57% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
38.50%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 38.50% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
2.24%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
0.10%
AR growth of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
4.81%
Inventory growth of 4.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
16.45%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
27.76%
BV/share growth of 27.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.41%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
18.99%
R&D growth of 18.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-18.83%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.