PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.97%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.73%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
4.03%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Technology median of 5.64%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
16.31%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
12.45%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
207.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.40%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
204.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
4.94%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
5.32%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-7.43%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
59.20%
OCF growth of 59.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
136.40%
FCF growth of 136.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
36.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 68.88%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
-23.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 36.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-0.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.82%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
277.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 277.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
42.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 42.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-5.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
8874.99%
Net income/share CAGR of 8874.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
307.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 45.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
365.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
292.02%
Equity/share CAGR of 292.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
211.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 211.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
153.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 153.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
7.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 7.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
29.26%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-7.85%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
9.79%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
8.75%
Inventory growth of 8.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
11.76%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.02%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
7.81%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-1.82%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.25%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
3.09%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.