PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
8.67%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 7.07%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
-18.95%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 9.96%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-14.93%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 8.35%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-47.61%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-48.68%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 7.14%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-47.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 6.67%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.47%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.45%
Dividend growth of 2.45% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-23.75%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-222.99%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
42.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 106.89%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-19.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 58.90%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
13.52%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 24.95%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
2418.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 2418.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-16.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-19.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
7472.52%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.60% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 58.16%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-64.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 30.88%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
287.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 287.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
182.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 182.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
76.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
15.66%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-4.26%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-1.77%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
12.58%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
10.11%
Inventory growth of 10.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-6.23%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.27%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.38%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.89%
Debt growth of 4.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
33.25%
R&D growth of 33.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
13.25%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.