PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.30%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.22%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
15.97%
EBIT growth of 15.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
15.09%
Operating income growth of 15.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-6.77%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2.56%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-2.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.73%
Share change of 0.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
17.08%
Diluted share change of 17.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
4.95%
Dividend growth of 4.95% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
34.22%
OCF growth of 34.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-197.20%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
29.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 64.87%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-26.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 41.12%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.01%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 16.48%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
-2.10%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
7.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 7.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
24.27%
3Y OCF/share growth of 24.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
953.20%
Net income/share CAGR of 953.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
90.10%
Net income/share CAGR of 90.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
299.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 299.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
302.95%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 50.88% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
168.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 34.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
91.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
21.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.42% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-2.02%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-2.13%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-6.69%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
9.89%
Inventory growth of 9.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.38%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.45%
BV/share growth of 0.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.74%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-17.26%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-11.48%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.