PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.42%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-49.76%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-230.13%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-230.13%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-185.65%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-184.62%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-184.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.23%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
1.23%
Diluted share change of 1.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-1.21%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
392.44%
OCF growth of 392.44% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
131.24%
FCF growth of 131.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-15.41%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 48.48%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-28.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.39%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-17.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.85%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
1951.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1951.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
200.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 200.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
65.62%
3Y OCF/share growth of 65.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
12.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 12.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-319.46%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-430.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
352.70%
Equity/share CAGR of 352.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
150.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 150.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
85.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-79.28%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-2.78%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-2.08%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-14.48%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-8.31%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.13%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.76%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.28%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-7.62%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
14.94%
SG&A growth of 14.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.