PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.23%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-17.32%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
17.79%
EBIT growth of 17.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
17.79%
Operating income growth of 17.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
40.61%
Net income growth of 40.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
36.36%
EPS growth of 36.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth of 36.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-6.67%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.67%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.15%
Dividend growth of 7.15% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-43.00%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-90.98%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-22.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 51.96%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-30.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.62%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 1.87%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
23879.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 23879.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
98.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 98.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-44.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
26.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 26.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
27.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-166.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -14.15%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
283.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 283.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
154.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 154.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
78.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-68.64%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
1.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
1.65%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-13.03%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-16.82%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.73%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.32%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.53%
Debt growth of 1.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-13.11%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-22.00%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.