PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.35%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.35%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-9.39%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-9.39%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.85%
Net income growth of 0.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-3.57%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-4.27%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-4.27%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
1.64%
Dividend growth of 1.64% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
133.53%
OCF growth of 133.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
2372.73%
FCF growth of 2372.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-12.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 13.73%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
44.05%
5Y CAGR of 44.05% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
27.18%
3Y CAGR of 27.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
90.99%
OCF/share CAGR of 90.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
16.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 16.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
160.94%
3Y OCF/share growth of 160.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-16.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-293.74%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is -2.21%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-187.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -7.46%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
419.26%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.13% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
175.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
158.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
28.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 28.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
6.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
54.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.74% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-17.32%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-16.56%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.51%
Asset growth of 3.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
7.46%
BV/share growth of 7.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.19%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.70%
R&D growth of 6.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-3.53%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.