205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.34%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
40.10%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
452.27%
EBIT growth of 452.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
452.27%
Operating income growth of 452.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
350.00%
Net income growth of 350.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
350.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
350.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.11%
Dividend growth of 18.11% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
30.74%
OCF growth of 30.74% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
19.32%
FCF growth of 19.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-23.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 27.68%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-31.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-23.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
92.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-48.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
5.65%
3Y OCF/share growth of 5.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-12.50%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-69.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-75.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
285.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
105.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 105.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
42.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 42.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
15.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
6.77%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.77% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
8.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
22.90%
AR growth of 22.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.77%
Inventory growth of 6.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.53%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.98%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
R&D growth of 4.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
11.32%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.