205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.54%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.90%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-38.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-38.53%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-413.30%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-427.27%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-427.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-4.63%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-4.63%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.93%
Dividend growth of 3.93% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
31.68%
OCF growth of 31.68% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
71.62%
FCF growth of 71.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-5.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-15.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-15.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
85.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
50.12%
OCF/share CAGR of 50.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-19.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-771.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-97.66%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-236.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
384.28%
Equity/share CAGR of 384.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
73.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 73.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
22.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 22.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
31.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
1.27%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
11.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 11.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-19.03%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.01%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.48%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.47%
BV/share growth of 1.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.80%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.