PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
1.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Technology median of 3.93%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental margin deterioration.
-18.30%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-18.30%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
3.42%
Net income growth of 3.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Share change of 3.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.42%
Diluted share change of 3.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-3.31%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
92.86%
OCF growth of 92.86% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
237.50%
FCF growth of 237.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-16.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 9.42%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-2.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
23.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
10.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 10.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-41.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-18.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
110.54%
Net income/share CAGR of 110.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-90.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -8.90%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
285.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
66.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 66.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-14.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
15.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
1.45%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
7.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
5.49%
AR growth of 5.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
13.38%
Inventory growth of 13.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.66%
Asset growth of 1.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.39%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-12.30%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.92%
R&D growth of 3.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.97%
SG&A growth of 8.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.