PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
15.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
75.90%
EBIT growth of 75.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
75.90%
Operating income growth of 75.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
14.77%
Net income growth of 14.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-16.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
50.74%
Share change of 50.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
51.98%
Diluted share change of 51.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-35.45%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
109.22%
OCF growth of 109.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
186.64%
FCF growth of 186.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-48.19%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 15.73%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
21.71%
5Y CAGR of 21.71% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-38.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
36.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 36.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
120.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 120.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
8.97%
3Y OCF/share growth of 8.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
71.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 71.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
137.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 137.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-45.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
127.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 127.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
59.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 59.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-36.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-5.96%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-4.47%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-34.92%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-4.66%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.11%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.81%
Asset growth of 2.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-31.13%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.48%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-4.27%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.60%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.