PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth of 5.99% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
10.72%
Gross profit growth of 10.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
8.22%
EBIT growth of 8.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
8.22%
Operating income growth of 8.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-28.46%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.55%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-34.35%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
53.69%
Dividend growth of 53.69% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-63.17%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-101.01%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
0.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 33.90%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
32.83%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
18.57%
3Y CAGR of 18.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-19.88%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
67.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
237.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 237.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
130.60%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
32.77%
Net income/share CAGR of 32.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
62.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
309.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 309.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
66.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 66.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-5.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
83.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
3.43%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
2.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.09% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
15.64%
AR growth of 15.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
16.67%
Inventory growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.77%
Asset growth of 1.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
52.33%
BV/share growth of 52.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.36%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.27%
R&D growth of 10.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
14.94%
SG&A growth of 14.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.