PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.03%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
24.89%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
24.89%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
20.16%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
19.05%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.79%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-1.12%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.76%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
28.75%
OCF growth of 28.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
1975.00%
FCF growth of 1975.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 20.25%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
22.96%
5Y CAGR of 22.96% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
61.53%
3Y CAGR of 61.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
45.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 45.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
48.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 48.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
99.88%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.11% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
21.43%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.28%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
327.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 41.28%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
287.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 287.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
68.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 68.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-0.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
81.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-1.12%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
1.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
15.02%
AR growth of 15.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.93%
Inventory growth of 11.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.68%
Asset growth of 1.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.11%
BV/share growth of 1.11% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-4.70%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
4.05%
R&D growth of 4.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.93%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.