205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
0.54%
Gross profit growth of 0.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
10.98%
EBIT growth of 10.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
10.98%
Operating income growth of 10.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
27.66%
Net income growth of 27.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
32.00%
EPS growth of 32.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 28.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.93%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.79%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
86.17%
OCF growth of 86.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
308.00%
FCF growth of 308.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 41.02%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
69.82%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
102.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 102.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
72.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share growth of 172.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
158.75%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.14% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
36.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
564.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 70.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
285.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
58.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 58.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
7.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 7.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
39.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 39.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
5.99%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-6.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
1.81%
AR growth of 1.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.53%
Inventory growth of 5.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.54%
Asset growth of 0.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.72%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-51.52%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-6.03%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.93%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.