205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.98%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-10.41%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-26.33%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-26.33%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-12.97%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-12.12%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-12.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.35%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.65%
Dividend growth of 22.65% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
38.54%
OCF growth of 38.54% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
78.76%
FCF growth of 78.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-2.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 25.50%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
16.81%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
63.75%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
160.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 160.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
34.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
55.27%
3Y OCF/share growth of 55.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
124.14%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
7.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
492.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 67.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
269.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 269.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
41.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 41.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
2.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 2.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
64.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
29.35%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.35% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
13.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-13.69%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-7.37%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.00%
Asset growth of 1.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.65%
BV/share growth of 1.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.04%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.04%
R&D growth of 1.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.72%
SG&A growth of 3.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.